I have been looking through the internet and can not find anything specific for the year 1970, only the 1970s. I'm looking for information on the politics, economy, social issues, major events, and foreign affairs for the year 1970.|||Try this:
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/1970.htm鈥?/a>
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
What is the plan by the GOP to recover the economy?
This is an intelligent question that deserves an intelligent answer.
No smart@$$es, no insults and no simple answers.
Please give links to your sources and information.
Any experts in the subjects (in economy or in political science) would be appreciated.
Thank you.|||castrate obama.
that is all they can do with just the house.
maybe they can force some the COMPROMISE the dems promised 2yrs ago and get the bush tax cuts extended|||"Spend less."
Of course, most economists are saying that the public sector actually needs to spend more to compensate for the fall in private sector spending. By spending on the deficit, the government brings demand back towards equilibrium with supply.
Contractionary policy is deflationary . . . and really isn't a good idea when faced with slow growth and high unemployment. In fact, it is the exact wrong reaction.
In other words, the GOP plan is to defy all economic experience and theory.|||The GOP/Teabag/Fox 'News' party works for the trans national corporations. Some of them of course are true believers in the propaganda they've been spreading about how everyone but themselves are 'far left liberals', or socialists or commies. I also suspect that some of them really believe that cutting taxes for the 'rich' will somehow cause the trans national corporations who've already abandon our measly 300 million consumers for the two BILLION customers in China and India will suddenly do right by our country. Big clue: They have no country! The Chinese are sly and our 'teabag' friends are 'easily led'. China gives corporations a deal they can't refuse and the American wage earner is hung out to dry. Sorry chumps, but business is business! Because of their actions the US goes down the tubes and we're all eating rice and mu shu pork! Of course the real movers and shakers...the folks that are behind the Teabag Right ...know all this...they ARE the corporate weasels that for thirty pieces of silver sold out the entire American working class. The short answer to the question is the 'economy' is fine..it's just not in the United States anymore and no matter how much they cut taxes the 'jobs' ain't coming back. By the time the 'true believers' get the picture it's going to be way too late. So far the corporations have used their tax breaks to buy each other up...picking them off one by one! You can look this up...Billions and billions of of tax break dollars have gone not to 'create jobs', but to buy up smaller corporations to increase market share. Big clue: The world is already at 100% production...it just isn't here and no matter what the GOP/Teabag/Fox 'News' propaganda machine says.....the US worker is totally $%^%26amp;ed ! I'm standing by for all the thumbs down, but if any of your voted these bums in you're going to be really sorry! No kiddin'!|||The GOP has one primary mission; do what-they can to ensure the Obama Administration fails. The GOP did not want to win the 2008 presidential elections. They knew fixing the mess Bush ws leaving behind would take a lot of time, a lot of money and a lot of unpopular decisions. They felt it was in their best interest to let the Democrats win then do everything they can to see the Democratic administration fails. They have worked hard in the past 20 months to ensure failure and Mitch McConnell says they will continue to do so in the next two years.
The GOP did not want our economy or our employment situation to improve under Obama. That would set the Democrats up for another win in 2010 and 2012; the GOP wants the Obama Administration to fail and will do everything they can to see that anything the current administration tries will not succeed. By now we should have been on our way to resolving many of our problems but the GOP Leadership has blocked everything the Dem's have tried to do. Their radical public media (Limbaugh, Hannity Palin and FOX TV and affiliated TV and Radio stations) have spent thousands of air time hours criticizing the efforts of those in Washington who are working to resolve our problems, At the same time people like Boehner and McConnell are doing what they can to stall any positive things so the Obama Administration can not be credited with any success.|||Big and small business knows that the Republicans are pro-business. They know that they will not be over taxed or over regulated.
Expect the markets to get higher (not tomorrow though because the feds are printing more money, so inflation will take off soon) however if the Republicans can rein in spending and not spend the rest of the money in the Stimulus Bill.. it might even out.
However, I would not be surprised to see unemployment down to 6% by March-April|||All they have said so far is cut taxes and reduce the deficit. They want to cut spending, but they have not been able to name specifics that they could cut that would offset the increased deficit amounts caused by the tax cuts.
When they say secure the boarder, they ignore the fact that US deportations of illegal immigrants at record levels under Obama.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/101006/wo鈥?/a>
This might seem like a smart@ss answer, but it is unfortunately true. This has been one of the large problems going into this election. Most of the talk has been focused around obstructing Obama and repealing the healthcare bill.|||Stop the spending and extend tax cuts.
But I'd imagine that what happened today will also have an effect on the economy in it's own right.
Let's see what happens in the stock market in the coming days and weeks.|||first - try to stop the unnecessary spending, and inflation, BUT the FED just today took another step in the wrong direction. terrible.
extend tax cuts
downsize government
end the war(s)
ship out illegals and save trillions wasted on them !|||They don't have much of one that I have seen.
Mostly their plan is to stop Obama.
They want to stop him from passing anymore new taxes, like the Health Care taxes, for example.|||take credit for the recovery that is already happenng.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10264/108鈥?/a>|||I don't know, they have been very tight lipped about their post election plans for government. I guess we will find out in a few months.|||none. They hope it will get worst so they have a better chance to take the White House in the next presidential election.|||Invest in U-haul stocks very soon, there were many Democrats that lost there jobs tonight. That was the first part of the GOP recovery|||Hussein is still president.|||drink tea in their large social gatherings|||They didn't think that far ahead
No smart@$$es, no insults and no simple answers.
Please give links to your sources and information.
Any experts in the subjects (in economy or in political science) would be appreciated.
Thank you.|||castrate obama.
that is all they can do with just the house.
maybe they can force some the COMPROMISE the dems promised 2yrs ago and get the bush tax cuts extended|||"Spend less."
Of course, most economists are saying that the public sector actually needs to spend more to compensate for the fall in private sector spending. By spending on the deficit, the government brings demand back towards equilibrium with supply.
Contractionary policy is deflationary . . . and really isn't a good idea when faced with slow growth and high unemployment. In fact, it is the exact wrong reaction.
In other words, the GOP plan is to defy all economic experience and theory.|||The GOP/Teabag/Fox 'News' party works for the trans national corporations. Some of them of course are true believers in the propaganda they've been spreading about how everyone but themselves are 'far left liberals', or socialists or commies. I also suspect that some of them really believe that cutting taxes for the 'rich' will somehow cause the trans national corporations who've already abandon our measly 300 million consumers for the two BILLION customers in China and India will suddenly do right by our country. Big clue: They have no country! The Chinese are sly and our 'teabag' friends are 'easily led'. China gives corporations a deal they can't refuse and the American wage earner is hung out to dry. Sorry chumps, but business is business! Because of their actions the US goes down the tubes and we're all eating rice and mu shu pork! Of course the real movers and shakers...the folks that are behind the Teabag Right ...know all this...they ARE the corporate weasels that for thirty pieces of silver sold out the entire American working class. The short answer to the question is the 'economy' is fine..it's just not in the United States anymore and no matter how much they cut taxes the 'jobs' ain't coming back. By the time the 'true believers' get the picture it's going to be way too late. So far the corporations have used their tax breaks to buy each other up...picking them off one by one! You can look this up...Billions and billions of of tax break dollars have gone not to 'create jobs', but to buy up smaller corporations to increase market share. Big clue: The world is already at 100% production...it just isn't here and no matter what the GOP/Teabag/Fox 'News' propaganda machine says.....the US worker is totally $%^%26amp;ed ! I'm standing by for all the thumbs down, but if any of your voted these bums in you're going to be really sorry! No kiddin'!|||The GOP has one primary mission; do what-they can to ensure the Obama Administration fails. The GOP did not want to win the 2008 presidential elections. They knew fixing the mess Bush ws leaving behind would take a lot of time, a lot of money and a lot of unpopular decisions. They felt it was in their best interest to let the Democrats win then do everything they can to see the Democratic administration fails. They have worked hard in the past 20 months to ensure failure and Mitch McConnell says they will continue to do so in the next two years.
The GOP did not want our economy or our employment situation to improve under Obama. That would set the Democrats up for another win in 2010 and 2012; the GOP wants the Obama Administration to fail and will do everything they can to see that anything the current administration tries will not succeed. By now we should have been on our way to resolving many of our problems but the GOP Leadership has blocked everything the Dem's have tried to do. Their radical public media (Limbaugh, Hannity Palin and FOX TV and affiliated TV and Radio stations) have spent thousands of air time hours criticizing the efforts of those in Washington who are working to resolve our problems, At the same time people like Boehner and McConnell are doing what they can to stall any positive things so the Obama Administration can not be credited with any success.|||Big and small business knows that the Republicans are pro-business. They know that they will not be over taxed or over regulated.
Expect the markets to get higher (not tomorrow though because the feds are printing more money, so inflation will take off soon) however if the Republicans can rein in spending and not spend the rest of the money in the Stimulus Bill.. it might even out.
However, I would not be surprised to see unemployment down to 6% by March-April|||All they have said so far is cut taxes and reduce the deficit. They want to cut spending, but they have not been able to name specifics that they could cut that would offset the increased deficit amounts caused by the tax cuts.
When they say secure the boarder, they ignore the fact that US deportations of illegal immigrants at record levels under Obama.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/101006/wo鈥?/a>
This might seem like a smart@ss answer, but it is unfortunately true. This has been one of the large problems going into this election. Most of the talk has been focused around obstructing Obama and repealing the healthcare bill.|||Stop the spending and extend tax cuts.
But I'd imagine that what happened today will also have an effect on the economy in it's own right.
Let's see what happens in the stock market in the coming days and weeks.|||first - try to stop the unnecessary spending, and inflation, BUT the FED just today took another step in the wrong direction. terrible.
extend tax cuts
downsize government
end the war(s)
ship out illegals and save trillions wasted on them !|||They don't have much of one that I have seen.
Mostly their plan is to stop Obama.
They want to stop him from passing anymore new taxes, like the Health Care taxes, for example.|||take credit for the recovery that is already happenng.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10264/108鈥?/a>|||I don't know, they have been very tight lipped about their post election plans for government. I guess we will find out in a few months.|||none. They hope it will get worst so they have a better chance to take the White House in the next presidential election.|||Invest in U-haul stocks very soon, there were many Democrats that lost there jobs tonight. That was the first part of the GOP recovery|||Hussein is still president.|||drink tea in their large social gatherings|||They didn't think that far ahead
Define " Information and communication Technology" and its role to the development of an economy?
Iwant you to give me the definition and its contribution to the economy and science|||its computer science and because of computers getting faster, they influence how the economy is run (do your own hw)
Assume the following information is relevant for an advanced economy over a three-year period.?
Year-Increase Price in Index-Increase in Labor Productitvity
1 167 4%
2 174 3%
3 181 2.5%
IndustrialProduction-Average Unemplyment Rate-Hr. Wage
4% 4.5% $6
2% 5.2% $6.50
1.5% 5.8% $7.10|||I can't see anything bad in this figures. Actually everything depends on wages starting point and changes in MPC in some sense. Of course it's obvious that productivity grows slower than real wages which consequently leads to higher unemployment rates as classical analysis suggests. But it only from the first view. For instance if in closest countries wage levels already twice higher then wage-increase could be much faster than evidence suggests - overvise labor migration could arise (due to differences in incomes and/or social conditions) - labor in open economies is the same resource as capital (take for instance labor mobility in European Union, there almost no any barriers left). It can also just show that capital becomes cheaper and labor more expensive (remember MPC/r=MPL/W equation?).
And yes it's true, it seems like purchasing power is rising (so does internal demand), but there is no data about market structures (if they are highly monopolized and uncontrolled - then inflation could rise due to monopolies, not because of higher demand - it's hard to decide with only data you provided) - so "cost-push inflation" is not evident (wages could be spent on investment instead of consumption and consumption could be due to previous obligations like pensions or credits, or it could be consumption made by non-residents - so more research on sources required). Some extra indicators should be used to make comparative analysis (except if this system is closed economy). Overvise wrong conclusions and following "supply-side economics" tools may be done by the cost of "demand-side" that in long-term will lead to disastrous effect on social condition and total population (demographic changes).
Limiting wages or increasing taxes or subsidies businesses etc. other methods can play a bad joke over the long-run due to wrong analysis. Yeah politics are jammed in such trap. Usually in ideal system social wealth-fare is followed (better income distribution, health-care, etc.) more than business-productivity-inflation staff.
So: conclusion is - there is no enough data available.
1 167 4%
2 174 3%
3 181 2.5%
IndustrialProduction-Average Unemplyment Rate-Hr. Wage
4% 4.5% $6
2% 5.2% $6.50
1.5% 5.8% $7.10|||I can't see anything bad in this figures. Actually everything depends on wages starting point and changes in MPC in some sense. Of course it's obvious that productivity grows slower than real wages which consequently leads to higher unemployment rates as classical analysis suggests. But it only from the first view. For instance if in closest countries wage levels already twice higher then wage-increase could be much faster than evidence suggests - overvise labor migration could arise (due to differences in incomes and/or social conditions) - labor in open economies is the same resource as capital (take for instance labor mobility in European Union, there almost no any barriers left). It can also just show that capital becomes cheaper and labor more expensive (remember MPC/r=MPL/W equation?).
And yes it's true, it seems like purchasing power is rising (so does internal demand), but there is no data about market structures (if they are highly monopolized and uncontrolled - then inflation could rise due to monopolies, not because of higher demand - it's hard to decide with only data you provided) - so "cost-push inflation" is not evident (wages could be spent on investment instead of consumption and consumption could be due to previous obligations like pensions or credits, or it could be consumption made by non-residents - so more research on sources required). Some extra indicators should be used to make comparative analysis (except if this system is closed economy). Overvise wrong conclusions and following "supply-side economics" tools may be done by the cost of "demand-side" that in long-term will lead to disastrous effect on social condition and total population (demographic changes).
Limiting wages or increasing taxes or subsidies businesses etc. other methods can play a bad joke over the long-run due to wrong analysis. Yeah politics are jammed in such trap. Usually in ideal system social wealth-fare is followed (better income distribution, health-care, etc.) more than business-productivity-inflation staff.
So: conclusion is - there is no enough data available.
Who can give me information about ethiopia about its economy and its in atheletics ?
if possible their religion and natural scenery|||Ethiopian is an east africa country with best natural beauty and attractive scenery
and many historic places and heritages most of them had been made of out pure rock.
They are absolutely known for ther long run in athletes
they were able to produce talened runners like
Kenenisa bekele
Tirunesh Dibaba
mesert Difar
I read that ethiopia is one of the poors counry
about religion they are almost orthodox follors assumed to be very careful about their religion
and many historic places and heritages most of them had been made of out pure rock.
They are absolutely known for ther long run in athletes
they were able to produce talened runners like
Kenenisa bekele
Tirunesh Dibaba
mesert Difar
I read that ethiopia is one of the poors counry
about religion they are almost orthodox follors assumed to be very careful about their religion
What is the united States? Include information on government and politics and its economy.?
Explain the goverment|||Give this a read.
From where can i get information regarding the impact of SEZ on the indian economy.....?
Just google it.... You will find lakhs of articles|||you can get some info from following links
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/apr/17se鈥?/a>
http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:0NbA鈥?/a>
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/apr/17se鈥?/a>
http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:0NbA鈥?/a>
How is Uranium mining effecting Australian economy (in a good way)?
I was just wondering how big of an industry uranium mining is in Australia and any other important information on the effect on the economy to uranium mining|||Australia has the worlds largest known resources of uranium, with about 25% of the total. Production is about 10,000 tons per year of U3O8 ("yellowcake"), making Australia the world second largest producer after Canada.
Uranium prices fell to a low of $7 per pound in 2001, but recovered to hit $72 per pound in 2007, and is still above $60 per pound.
Australia exports all its Uranium - none is used domestically. Exports are controlled to ensure peaceful use. The principal benefit is export income and jobs. Exports earn about $1.4 billion per year and about 12,000 people are employed. Use of nuclear power with Australian uranium reduces greenhouse gas emissions by about 400 million tons per year.
Uranium mining is controversial in Australia, and has long been restricted by the government. Queensland bans uranium mining completely.
However the largest uranium mine in the world, the planned open cut expansion of the Olympic Dam mine in South Australia looks set to go ahead.
This will be a huge state of the art mine, making extensive use of automated mining equipment. Construction and operation will generate many thousands of jobs.
Uranium prices fell to a low of $7 per pound in 2001, but recovered to hit $72 per pound in 2007, and is still above $60 per pound.
Australia exports all its Uranium - none is used domestically. Exports are controlled to ensure peaceful use. The principal benefit is export income and jobs. Exports earn about $1.4 billion per year and about 12,000 people are employed. Use of nuclear power with Australian uranium reduces greenhouse gas emissions by about 400 million tons per year.
Uranium mining is controversial in Australia, and has long been restricted by the government. Queensland bans uranium mining completely.
However the largest uranium mine in the world, the planned open cut expansion of the Olympic Dam mine in South Australia looks set to go ahead.
This will be a huge state of the art mine, making extensive use of automated mining equipment. Construction and operation will generate many thousands of jobs.
What was the state of the Native American economy during the 1950s to the 1980s?
If you could cite any reliable information concerning the state of Native American economy during any year/s within 1950 to 1975, it would be much appreciated.
e.g. Native American:
poverty rates
income per household
income per family
average income compared with the national average
etc.
If you could please cite reliable sources on this issue...I'm having a tough time finding solid facts. I would even appreciate a list of possible sources which I could look into for this information. Thank you very much in advance!|||Check ot the National Archives section on Native Americans. There's no single compilation of data unfortunately. You may have to collate that data yourself.
http://www.archives.gov/research/native-鈥?/a>
Here is a listing of the various records you can look up along with where you can request copies of records.
http://www.archives.gov/research/guide-f鈥?/a>
And you can't forget the Bureau of Indan Affairs website.
http://www.doi.gov/bureau-indian-affairs鈥?/a>
Also, the records at the University of Colorado in Boulder as a lot of information along with links to other informational sites.
http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/govpubs鈥?/a>
This, however, is probably the specific information that you are looking for.
http://www.census.gov/population/www/soc鈥?/a>
You can request historical data from the Census Bureau, however, I'm sure that costs quite a bit. You may be able to find copies of that census data from your local library though.|||America in Ferment: The Tumultuous 1960s
The Native American Power Movement
Period: 1960s
previous next
Printable Page
In November 1969, some 200 Native Americans seized the abandoned federal penitentiary on Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay. For 19 months, Indian activists occupied the island to draw attention to conditions on the nation's Indian reservations. Alcatraz, the Native Americans said, symbolized conditions on reservations: "It has no running water; it has inadequate sanitation facilities; there is no industry, and so unemployment is very great; there are no health care facilities; the soil is rocky and unproductive." The activists, who called themselves Indians of All Tribes, offered to buy Alcatraz from the federal government for "$24 in glass beads and red cloth."
On Thanksgiving Day 1970, Wampanoag Indians, who had taken part at the first Thanksgiving 350 years earlier, held a National Day of Mourning at Plymouth, Massachusetts. A tribal representative declared, "We forfeited our country. Our lands have fallen into the hands of the aggressor. We have allowed the white man to keep us on our knees." Meanwhile, another group of Native Americans established a settlement at Mount Rushmore to demonstrate Indian claims to the Black Hills.
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, a new spirit of political militancy arose among the first Americans, just as it had among black Americans and women. No other group, however, faced problems more severe than Native Americans. Throughout the 1960s, American Indians were the nation's poorest minority group, more deprived than any other group, according to virtually every socioeconomic measure. In 1970, the Indian unemployment rate was 10 times the national average, and 40 percent of the Native American population lived below the poverty line. In that year, Native American life expectancy was just 44 years, a third less than that of the average American. In one Apache town of 2,500 on the San Carlos reservation in Arizona, there were only 25 telephones, and most homes had outdoor toilets and relied on wood burning stoves for heat.
Conditions on many of the nation's reservations were not unlike those found in underdeveloped areas of Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The death rate among Native Americans exceeded that of the total U.S. population by a third. Deaths caused by pneumonia, hepatitis, dysentery, strep throat, diabetes, tuberculosis, alcoholism, suicide, and homicide were 2 to 60 times higher than the entire U.S. population. Half a million Indian families lived in unsanitary, dilapidated dwellings, many in shanties, huts, or even abandoned automobiles.
e.g. Native American:
poverty rates
income per household
income per family
average income compared with the national average
etc.
If you could please cite reliable sources on this issue...I'm having a tough time finding solid facts. I would even appreciate a list of possible sources which I could look into for this information. Thank you very much in advance!|||Check ot the National Archives section on Native Americans. There's no single compilation of data unfortunately. You may have to collate that data yourself.
http://www.archives.gov/research/native-鈥?/a>
Here is a listing of the various records you can look up along with where you can request copies of records.
http://www.archives.gov/research/guide-f鈥?/a>
And you can't forget the Bureau of Indan Affairs website.
http://www.doi.gov/bureau-indian-affairs鈥?/a>
Also, the records at the University of Colorado in Boulder as a lot of information along with links to other informational sites.
http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/govpubs鈥?/a>
This, however, is probably the specific information that you are looking for.
http://www.census.gov/population/www/soc鈥?/a>
You can request historical data from the Census Bureau, however, I'm sure that costs quite a bit. You may be able to find copies of that census data from your local library though.|||America in Ferment: The Tumultuous 1960s
The Native American Power Movement
Period: 1960s
previous next
Printable Page
In November 1969, some 200 Native Americans seized the abandoned federal penitentiary on Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay. For 19 months, Indian activists occupied the island to draw attention to conditions on the nation's Indian reservations. Alcatraz, the Native Americans said, symbolized conditions on reservations: "It has no running water; it has inadequate sanitation facilities; there is no industry, and so unemployment is very great; there are no health care facilities; the soil is rocky and unproductive." The activists, who called themselves Indians of All Tribes, offered to buy Alcatraz from the federal government for "$24 in glass beads and red cloth."
On Thanksgiving Day 1970, Wampanoag Indians, who had taken part at the first Thanksgiving 350 years earlier, held a National Day of Mourning at Plymouth, Massachusetts. A tribal representative declared, "We forfeited our country. Our lands have fallen into the hands of the aggressor. We have allowed the white man to keep us on our knees." Meanwhile, another group of Native Americans established a settlement at Mount Rushmore to demonstrate Indian claims to the Black Hills.
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, a new spirit of political militancy arose among the first Americans, just as it had among black Americans and women. No other group, however, faced problems more severe than Native Americans. Throughout the 1960s, American Indians were the nation's poorest minority group, more deprived than any other group, according to virtually every socioeconomic measure. In 1970, the Indian unemployment rate was 10 times the national average, and 40 percent of the Native American population lived below the poverty line. In that year, Native American life expectancy was just 44 years, a third less than that of the average American. In one Apache town of 2,500 on the San Carlos reservation in Arizona, there were only 25 telephones, and most homes had outdoor toilets and relied on wood burning stoves for heat.
Conditions on many of the nation's reservations were not unlike those found in underdeveloped areas of Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The death rate among Native Americans exceeded that of the total U.S. population by a third. Deaths caused by pneumonia, hepatitis, dysentery, strep throat, diabetes, tuberculosis, alcoholism, suicide, and homicide were 2 to 60 times higher than the entire U.S. population. Half a million Indian families lived in unsanitary, dilapidated dwellings, many in shanties, huts, or even abandoned automobiles.
Can someone please tell me about the prejudice and the economy during the British slave trade?
I'm writing a paper about William Wilberforce and i am suppose to address the prejudice and then the economy. And im having difficulties finding information. Thanks so much!|||Rent the movie Amazing Grace. From the moment Wilberforce introduced the anti-slavery issue, it was not a matter of prejudices he had to over come so much as an economic issue. Without the slave trade, the economy would collapse. They relied heavily on it. Rent the movie, though. It's amazing.
Does anyone know where I can find information on the ice cream market in Japan?
I am developing a market strategy for Dip In Dots. I need to find more information about the ice cream market in Japan to develop system that will allow Dip In Dots to penetrate the Japanese market. Any information on the Japanese economy would be very helpful.|||Apparently they already have it here.
If you scroll down, they have had it here since the 90s. http://www.answers.com/topic/dippin-dots
If you scroll down, they have had it here since the 90s. http://www.answers.com/topic/dippin-dots
Question about industries/economy in the New England Colonies?
can someone please help me with information about the economy and major industries in the New England Colonies? i just need to know major industries and a little information about them. this would be a really big help. thanks ahead of time!|||Mostly agricultural, corn, wheat, and indigo (a dye).
Some ship building, and export of lumber too.
In early colonial days, trade with Native Americans was a big money maker too.
Furs were bought from Indians, the Indians wanted cloth, beads, and sometimes alcohol or store made pots and gun powder.
Much of the sea trade went to either other colonies or England.
Colonists in all the colonies turned corn into whiskey, and made rum from sorgum. Later more rum was imported from the West Indies.
While slavery was rare in New England colonies, many of the merchants made money on transport of slaves, or investing in them for resale, from Africa.
Trade was main money maker, both with imports and exports, often on ships built there.
They had good harbors, better than in the Southern colonies.
Some ship building, and export of lumber too.
In early colonial days, trade with Native Americans was a big money maker too.
Furs were bought from Indians, the Indians wanted cloth, beads, and sometimes alcohol or store made pots and gun powder.
Much of the sea trade went to either other colonies or England.
Colonists in all the colonies turned corn into whiskey, and made rum from sorgum. Later more rum was imported from the West Indies.
While slavery was rare in New England colonies, many of the merchants made money on transport of slaves, or investing in them for resale, from Africa.
Trade was main money maker, both with imports and exports, often on ships built there.
They had good harbors, better than in the Southern colonies.
Information on the economy for italy?
Could you explain yourself more?... Italy is the seventh largest economy and 4 largest in Europe. its a capitalist economy with a high GDP and developed infrastructure. Its unemployment rate is 8.4% which is slightly lower then the European Union, though in general is still significantly high. Its GDP per capita (average income per person) Is $29,000 ranked 28th in the world, and can be compared to with Italy or greece. Italy has a very high debt which stricken the economy to have significant growth. Corruption is also a BIG issue. The inequality gap in the north and the south and high taxation (which many do not pay) are modern day issues italy is facing.... Thats some information with billions of more things that i haven't said....
Is the job market for information technology graduates still strong?
What with outsourcing and the terrible state of our economy, is a degree in Information Technology and Informatics still sought after?|||My company is closing a data center as it's getting outsourced. It is hard because Indians are taking the jobs. Though there is still a lot of demand, ther eis very demand new new graduates. You gotta be lucky to get a job.|||stop asking me questions i dont know
Information about Afghanistan after Taliban rule?
Where can I find information about the economy, government and international relations of Afghanistan after the Taliban rule. Can you please help me find some websites.|||start here
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications鈥?/a>
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications鈥?/a>
Need information about the economies of Australia and/or Vietnam?
I'm writing an essay and need information about economic efficiency and economic security for both countries. I'm not asking for cheats, I just want research sites.|||Google the embassies of both. If they don't know they may be able to tell you where to go.|||It's the best I could and 10 points is 10 points. How is the other one a cheat?
|||Hello Orpheus, Australian business and economy is the most thriving in the world and has made a stable base in the world economy. Australia is known as a western-style market economy. Australia is highly praised by various international organizations. One example is from the International Monetary Fund for brilliant macroeconomic management and consistent economic reform (Raby, Ph.D., 2010). The small business sectors in Australia are the most significant part of its economy. The amount of investment in Australia is fourth largest in the world. The per capital Gross Domestic Product is marginally less than the United States and United Kingdom which proves the high standards of the Australian Economy.... The full essay is here:
Report Abuse
|||Hello Orpheus, Australian business and economy is the most thriving in the world and has made a stable base in the world economy. Australia is known as a western-style market economy. Australia is highly praised by various international organizations. One example is from the International Monetary Fund for brilliant macroeconomic management and consistent economic reform (Raby, Ph.D., 2010). The small business sectors in Australia are the most significant part of its economy. The amount of investment in Australia is fourth largest in the world. The per capital Gross Domestic Product is marginally less than the United States and United Kingdom which proves the high standards of the Australian Economy.... The full essay is here:
I need some comparison between the Canadian and the Indian economy ?
I need websites or links and information on Canadian vs Indian economy in 2008-2009.|||There are articles compared and contrasted the economy of India and Canada in the fiscal year of 2008-2009. However, indicator of economic growth of higher GDP is not necessarily represent the life style and comfort in their homestead. It appears that India has better GDP growth in comparison to Canada. The majority Indian life is quite poor or even described as miserable and harsh life in India. However Canada is quite a good country to settle down and to establish a family. Simply Canada is a vast and clean country to live with comfort and affordability for the many immigrants. As matter of fact, Hong Kong is boasted its GDP growth quite steady before with the revenue is generated by land sale at highest price in this world and the over development has turned Hong Kong to become the top three most polluted city in this world and stinky, too. Just by reading the statistic and particularly the recorded income per capita of the household was HK $ 28,000 per month in 2007. Every newspaper in Hong Kong has published the articles indicating there are 340,000 Hong Kong are starved for having one half of the full meals each day on top the public concerned matter of two out of the total population of seven millions are living under the poverty line. Are you being fooled by the sky scrapers and florencent lights in Hong Kong? I bet once you visited Hong Kong you never want to come back again!! Why Hong Kong so bad? The more than 70% of total GDP is used to pay the highest paid civil servants in this world and the budget of the public services to th publics. Many observers are mad on those Hong Kong top ranking civil servants and good for nothing officials are currently making five to seven times as what the American or UK officials and senior ranks civil servants making. Hong Kong government must start to axe the overall overpaid civil servants by rang from 4% to as much as 60% to those overpaid.
http://centad.org/tradenews_972.asp
http://centad.org/tradenews_937.asp
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/answer鈥?/a>
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=THe%20C鈥?/a>
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=The%20I鈥?/a>|||answed it once, bhai!
http://centad.org/tradenews_972.asp
http://centad.org/tradenews_937.asp
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/answer鈥?/a>
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=THe%20C鈥?/a>
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=The%20I鈥?/a>|||answed it once, bhai!
What type of economy does Poland have?
What type of economy, what does that economy do, other information that would be helpful?|||Go and ask here www.polishforums.com they will be able to answer all your questions and they speak English there as well.
How much does 20 gallons of gas cost in today's economy?
Hi guys! I would like to know how much approximately does 20 gallons of gas cost in today's economy. Can I find this information on a website? Thank you for your help!|||It depends on where you live. Take the price at the pump near you and multiply by 20.
Where I live regular is about $2.75, so in my case the answer is $55|||In Chicago Il on the corner the gas is $3.25.9 a gal
so 20 times $3.25.9 a gallon
Where I live regular is about $2.75, so in my case the answer is $55|||In Chicago Il on the corner the gas is $3.25.9 a gal
so 20 times $3.25.9 a gallon
What was the economy like in Canada during World War 2?
There's a lot of information out there about the economy of the U.S. and Europe and Germany, but does anyone know any specific struggles or (it doesn't even have to be a struggle) what kinds of thing Canadians were going through at the time of WWII?
ex. Were we low on certain resources? Were people who normally didn't work having to work to support their families during a time of struggle?
Even if you just post a good website it would be very helpful! Thank you!|||http://www.linksnorth.com/canada-history鈥?/a> and IN 1939, Canada was a mainly agricultural country with over 60 percent of the population living in rural towns or on farms. The industrial sector was concentrated in Quebec and Ontario, and most exports were raw materials from the forests, and mines.
The need to clothe, feed and equip the Canadian armed forces required a complete overhaul of Canadian manufacturing plants and processes. Many smaller towns became regional centers of manufacturing, based on what was needed by the military. Railway lines that were all ready in existance were designated as places that factories would be built beside.
With so many men going into the service, women were ecouraged to go to work in "war factories" where they learned completely new skills and got paid well, too. Soon things were operating around the clock, with three shifts, six days a week. Kids were brought to work, and care centres at the plant were normal. Teen agers were allowed to go to full time work at age 14, to supplement the work force.
Building of new military bases, as well as air fields, and ship yards, brought the need for more lumber, steel, and asphalt, and concrete supplies, as well as construction equipment. Making a simple thing like a naval life jacket produced many small companies in small towns. Sone of them are still in business.
Food production was increased, and so was the out put of home gardens. People were encouraged to grow their own vegetables.
Production of consumer goods stopped, and the factories were conveted to war production. For example, Inglis Appliances, in Toronto made Bren Machine Guns, and Sten sub Machine guns, and General Electric made search lights and radar for ships. Canadian Steel Car in Hamilton switched from making freight cars , to making fighter planes. General Motors in Oshawa, made over ONE MILLION trucks in WW2.
ex. Were we low on certain resources? Were people who normally didn't work having to work to support their families during a time of struggle?
Even if you just post a good website it would be very helpful! Thank you!|||http://www.linksnorth.com/canada-history鈥?/a> and IN 1939, Canada was a mainly agricultural country with over 60 percent of the population living in rural towns or on farms. The industrial sector was concentrated in Quebec and Ontario, and most exports were raw materials from the forests, and mines.
The need to clothe, feed and equip the Canadian armed forces required a complete overhaul of Canadian manufacturing plants and processes. Many smaller towns became regional centers of manufacturing, based on what was needed by the military. Railway lines that were all ready in existance were designated as places that factories would be built beside.
With so many men going into the service, women were ecouraged to go to work in "war factories" where they learned completely new skills and got paid well, too. Soon things were operating around the clock, with three shifts, six days a week. Kids were brought to work, and care centres at the plant were normal. Teen agers were allowed to go to full time work at age 14, to supplement the work force.
Building of new military bases, as well as air fields, and ship yards, brought the need for more lumber, steel, and asphalt, and concrete supplies, as well as construction equipment. Making a simple thing like a naval life jacket produced many small companies in small towns. Sone of them are still in business.
Food production was increased, and so was the out put of home gardens. People were encouraged to grow their own vegetables.
Production of consumer goods stopped, and the factories were conveted to war production. For example, Inglis Appliances, in Toronto made Bren Machine Guns, and Sten sub Machine guns, and General Electric made search lights and radar for ships. Canadian Steel Car in Hamilton switched from making freight cars , to making fighter planes. General Motors in Oshawa, made over ONE MILLION trucks in WW2.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)